A CHECKLIST FOR A PEER'S PAPER AND YOUR OWN

Author:  __________________________
Reviewer:  __________________________

Title
_____ Title is informative, concise, and does not promise more than paper will deliver

Abstract
_____ Reads like mini paper, emphasis on results and conclusions (< 300  words).
_____ States importance of study or results found

Introduction
_____ Begins generally and rapidly focuses in on the topic
_____ Gives historical, theoretical and empirical perspective about the paper's topic. (i.e., places paper within context of other papers written on subject.
_____ Defines new terms, concepts, and facts needed to understand what follows
_____ Hypothesis(es) are clearly stated at end of Introduction.

Materials and Methods
_____ M&M section has enough detail so that the experiment can be replicated,    but is not cluttered with information which is unnecessarily explicit.
_____ Examples of required detail: scientific names of subject, comprehensive    description of equipment used, biotic and abiotic conditions of lab (or field)   location that might affect results, measurements taken, time of experiment,   statistical tests performed, statistical alpha level set by experimenter. . . etc.
_____ Written in past tense; not in cookbook form.

Results
_____ Text and figures address the hypotheses stated in the Introduction
_____ Tables and figures are not redundant, but rather compliment one another.
_____ Data presented is a summarization of the data, NOT the raw data.
_____ All the appropriate data are properly presented without interpretation..
_____ Tables & figures are numbered sequentially and are referenced throughout the text where appropriate.
_____ Table and figure include captions that clearly explain graphs.
_____ Tables and figures are not cluttered, but rather simply present the minimum    amount of summary data, while still being meaningful.
_____ Axes are properly labeled with a meaningful scale for the data presented.
_____ Conclusions from statistical analyses are stated in the results text and supported with the important statistical numerical results (parenthetically)  immediately after the verbal description of the statistical conclusion.

Discussion
_____ Section develops and expands the Intro, molds it with results obtained,   interprets results, explains, justifies and supports the conclusions drawn.
_____ Limitations and assumptions in the experimental design and method are    addressed.
_____ Results that contradict your hypothesis are addressed.
_____ Invites reader to consider research projects that the current study sets the   stage for.

Literature Cited
_____ Alphabetical by first author last name.
_____ Single space within a citation and double space between citations.
_____ Uses citations for all information, methods, results, concepts, terms, etc.    that are not your very own & not considered common knowledge.
_____ Place citations at the end of the text being cited using (Author's last name,   date of publication). Note period comes after closed parentheses and not    before.
_____ Use actual quotes under only the rarest of circumstances (to emphasize a   famous author or a landmark quote like "survival of the fittest").

Format and Style
_____ Section headings are clearly delineated from the text (bold, underlined,    or CAPITAL print).
_____ Language is free from cliches, unexplained technical terminology and    other scientific jargon.
_____ Type font is clearly readable and consistent throughout paper.
_____ Paper is aimed at a specific, and the appropriate audience.
_____ Paper length is appropriate.
_____ Grammar and spelling have been checked and are infallible.

 MAKE COMMENTS ON YOUR PEER'S PAPER, AS WELL AS ON THIS FORM. ADDITIONALLY, WRITE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF YOUR THOUGHTS TO TIE THEM TOGETHER FOR YOUR PEER.

 YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REALLY HELP YOUR CLASSMATES.  While making suggestions, remember that your classmates want criticism but they have feelings too.  Your criticism should be concise, forthright and always constructive.  One can tear a paper apart without tearing apart the author.  This is a valuable skill that takes practice.  As you read your classmates paper learn from both their ideas, style and mistakes and incorporate what you have learned into your own work.


Author: Kenneth M. Crawford 

Copyright (c) 

Last Update : Thursday, August 13, 1999 - 9:31:07 AM